Fact or Fiction?
Westernized ideals teach us that millions of years ago, there existed Dinosaurs. We are taught that the dinosaurs became extinct for a variety of reasons, the main reason points to the Ice Age.
As we take a further look into the westernized concepts, we begin to uncover how many of these teachings are false. The story of the dinosaurs are no different. There are a few main reasons, of why the concept of the dinosaurs could be considered to be a fairy tale story:
Human Existence
Human existence roughly dates back to 100,000 BCE. Of course there are recent arguments to suggest that humans have existed on this planet for about 3,600,000 years. Throughout the entire timeline of human history, human beings (in all evolved forms) have demonstrated a consistency with creatively documenting their experiences through arts and craft (carvings, cave paintings, etc.)
 |
| Skeleton Remains of Lucy (3.2 million years old), the oldest human bones ever to exist. Note: the skeletal remains are incomplete, yet, scientists decorated the body to display Lucy to look like a chimpanzee (with NO evidence supporting her outer appearance) |
 |
| Scientists went above and beyond the reconstruction of Lucy, to make appear that Lucy was Black and looked like a Chimpanzee, without any evidence to support the physical structure |
Regardless of what time period we consider to be the beginning of human history, human existence pre-dates the Ice Age and other major geographical changes that occurred on our planet earth (such as the major volcanic activity in the Eastern Rift)
Throughout human history, humans have left no documented images behind that would support the concept of dinosaurs or most massive prehistoric mammals that "supposedly died off" (this includes the famous Saber Tooth Tiger) **Note: there is evidence of drawings of the Mammoth. The Mammoth, unlike other prehistoric animals, would be considered a practical creature that would be in line with the natural order and design. The Saber Tooth Tiger, on the other hand, was a very impractical concept, as this animal would undoubtedly be unable to maintain itself.
 |
| Famous Chavet Cave paintings of Lions, France |
One could argue, that the lack of documented evidence would be due to the fact that human beings were under developed and lacked the cognitive skills to be creative. This concept that we were not smart enough to develop creative works, could also be argued, as there is evidence that prove that creativity is the first skill under developed human beings use. It is creativity, that separates humans from the animal kingdom, or rather the level of creativity and reasoning skills that makes us who we are.
Modern Day Example: an infant who is unable to communicate verbally, will be able to develop creative items in order to exercise their level of intelligence and brain capacity. New born babies begin trying to develop things as an early method of communication. It is common, in fact, that before an infant is capable of fully seeing all colors, or is able to walk, or is able to speak, that this infant is prone to communicate easily with paint, drawings, building blocks and so on. In addition to the infant's able to communicate and express their personal desires through creative arts, infants also respond to the musical tones of their parents.
These are skills that babies are born with, that are already encoded into the child's DNA blueprint, prior to the child being influenced by the adults or older individuals around them.
This trait is consistent in history, and has existed as far back in human history as we can imagine. Adults raising children through the ages, have historically demonstrated the ability to encourage this natural traits in their children. Proof of this type of encouragement to enhance the natural creative skills of children, can be found in countless of documented stories of children who mastered creative arts from an early age (like, Beethoven, Mozart, and so on). Children were not always recorded geniuses as well. Children who followed in their parents footsteps to become carpenters, pottery makers, painters and other trades, have been recorded as been taught these skills before they were able to walk or speak. From music to visual art, children throughout history demonstrated their abilities to latch on to creative communication before they were reprogrammed to learn verbal communication.
So, if creativity has always existed in our genetics, why would our prehistoric ancestors NOT document beasts that would come after us to gobble us up in the night?
 |
| The Cartoon Movie, the Croods, depicts humans living beside prehistoric mammals that would kill them for food. A concept that is purely fictional, with no evidence of ever existing |
The animation movie called the Croods, is a movie about the prehistoric humans living beside prehistoric giant mammals. The family is migrating to find a sanctuary in order to survive. This movie is created as a propaganda to support the concept that prehistoric humans were under developed, white, and fighting to survive in a world that is completely unrealistic for them to ever exist in.
If the idea of the movie Croods, is true, then why would none of the individuals document the prehistoric creatures that they came across? ... because they were idiotic? No.
Consider this: if a giant monster was coming to gobble you up, the moment you had time, you would want to describe what you had seen to others. You would want to find a way to communicate your experience. Historically, cave paintings were the tool to do just that. Prehistoric civilizations use paintings and carvings to communicate with others about their experiences, to warn others of dangers and so on.
Therefore, the ideology that humans just "plain forgot" to document enormous Saber Tooth Tigers or Dinosaurs, contradicts the documented proof of the abilities and skills of our prehistoric ancestors.
 |
| Cave Paintings of a Hunted Animal |
The Argument: that dinosaurs existed before human existence?
Answer: If this is true, then the Ice Age couldn't have been the fatality of the dinosaurs, as the human race was present in the Ice Age? (a period documented a period of ice or as a giant flood)
So what killed the dinosaurs... an asteroid? Um, no.
An asteroid big enough to wipe out the dinosaurs, would have been big enough to wipe out the entire planet. Do the calculations yourself. The amount of radiation caused by such a catalytic event, would have killed off ALL life on the planet, not just "some life" on the planet. It makes no sense that an asteroid would fall from space and wipe out a single species of beings and yet spare "some" life that would continue to exist on a planet heavily radioactive.
The argument: the radioactivity of the asteroid was the reason that life was created or mutated into what it is now?
Answer: Our solar system provides us examples of what would happen to our planet if it became radioactive. The only planet able to retain life, is Earth (Aye). All the other planets remain lifeless and highly toxic, or have no real atmosphere, and are merely gas giants. It would seem, that these planets in our solar system have not changed also throughout the entire human history, as the great prehistoric civilizations studied these planets closely (techniques which we still use to this day). Therefore these planets didn't have life then, and still do not have life on them now. So, it could assumed that once a planet becomes radioactive and toxic, it is literally and virtually impossible for life to ever exist.
Famous Cave Drawings from Around the World
Below are some of the cave drawings found around the world, that depicted the life of prehistoric civilizations. You will probably notice that there is not a single drawing of dinosaurs.
The Unrealistic Structure of the Dinosaurs
Looking at the shaping of the dinosaurs bodies, it is clear to see that their entire design was useless or unnecessary. Over exaggerated. And so on.
Example: T-Rex was said to have been a massive lizard that walked on his two legs, and had tiny little hands and a big head. Modern day lizards do not carry these traits, at all. In addition, it would be virtually impossible for the T-Rex to be able to ever catch his food. This fictional animal seems to be more of a fairy tale than actuality.
 |
| T Rex: over exaggerated body structure, that is not naturally logical. From the over size head, tiny hands, enormous legs and massive tail. Think about it: How could this animal eat or go to the bathroom? How could it even sleep or maintain itself? |
As we uncover more truths in our stories, we will begin to see the pattern in the lies, and the purpose behind them.
Every lie, holds a purpose to the liar. Black History, has been twisted and manipulated by western "archeologists" for a couple thousand years. In time, as you research about your history, you will notice what I have been noticing, which is the racism in how "our" stories are being told. As well as the manipulation in our timeline, in which it makes it appear that we have not been civilized until modern era. A method colonists used to justified our enslavement.
The story of the dinosaurs holds a similar purpose. More than likely, the fossils of these animals were a combination of many different animals in the same location. And that the "scientists" pieced them together incorrectly, because their ego was determined to prove that these animals did exist... which they did not.
The purpose behind this particular lie, could be to support the necessity of superiority or to prove that supremacy discovered something that was never documented by ancient civilizations. Or to prove to the world that supremacy holds the key knowing how we came to exist.
Supremacy knows hardly anything about where we truly come from and can only rely on fiction stories like: Dinosaurs and Religion, to keep are minds drifting off into their fairy tale.
To conclude: I ask you that you feel free to leave any comments you have about this topic. Let's talk about it.
#ThinkDifferently
